Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6610697
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T19:52:25+00:00 2026-05-25T19:52:25+00:00

Is there a way to avoid copying large vectors, when a function expects a

  • 0

Is there a way to avoid copying large vectors, when a function expects a vector with (pointer to) baseclass objects as input but I only have a vector of (pointers to) derived objects?

class Base {};

class Derived : public Base {};

void doStuff(vector<Base*> &vec)
{
    //do stuff with vec objects
}

int main()
{
    vector<Derived*> fooDerived(1000000);

    vector<Base*> fooBase(fooDerived.begin(), fooDerived.end()); // how to avoid copying here?
    doStuff(fooBase);
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T19:52:25+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 7:52 pm

    If you could use a vector<Derived*> as if it where a vector<Base*>, you could add a pointer to a class OtherDerived : public Base to that vector. This would be dangerous.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a way to avoid processing of already processed nodes? Input XML <?xml
Is there a way to avoid row deletion on an specific table using constrains?
Is there a way to avoid postbacks with gridview every time a row is
Is there an easy way to avoid dealing with text encoding problems?
I'm hoping there's a way to avoid custom configuration files if an application runs
Is there any way to down-format a Subversion repository to avoid messages like this:
Is there some way I can define String[int] to avoid using String.CharAt(int) ?
Is there way in next piece of code to only get the first record?
Is there a way to enforce constraint checking in MSSQL only when inserting new
Is there a way to avoid using @SuppressWarnings below and to keep the same

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.