Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6647023
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T00:29:18+00:00 2026-05-26T00:29:18+00:00

Is there a way to basically mark a TestUnit test as a todo? I

  • 0

Is there a way to basically mark a TestUnit test as a “todo”? I thought I could do it by using pending at the top of the test, but that still runs the test (and thus it’s red). I’d like to basically do the same thing, but not actually run the test (just skip over it).

Does anybody know of a way to do this?

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T00:29:19+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 12:29 am

    if these are test case stubs, you could just put assert true as the only assertion and a puts in the test to describe what needs to be done. this of course wouldn’t help if your tests have failing assertions unless you comment them out.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a way that I can trace every method, basically a line trace,
That's basically the question, is there a right way to implement operator<< ? Reading
Is there any way I could dim my NSWindow (basically putting a black transparent
Is there a way to emulate mixins or traits in java? basically, I need
Is there any simple way to programatically colorize images in .NET? Basically we have
Is there an easy way to create standalone .exe files from Lua scripts? Basically
I basically need to check if there is an easier way to do this
Is there an easy (therefore quick) way to accomplish this? Basically just take some
Is there a way to basically get a nice UML or some kind of
Is there a way to basically do this: string x = hi; int hi

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.