Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 625243
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T19:17:19+00:00 2026-05-13T19:17:19+00:00

Is there a way to create a class Foo so that I can do:

  • 0

Is there a way to create a class Foo

so that I can do:

Foo foo;

but not

Foo* foo = new Foo(); 

?

I don’t want people to be able to allocate copies of Foo on the heap.

Thanks!

EDIT: Sorry, I was wrong on the “stack only, not heap”. What I want to say is “can not use new operator”.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T19:17:20+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:17 pm

    Make your operator new private.

    #include <new>
    
    struct Foo {
            int x;
    private:
            void* operator new (std::size_t size) throw (std::bad_alloc);
    };
    

    On C++0x you can delete the operator new:

    struct Foo {
            int x;
            void* operator new (std::size_t size) throw (std::bad_alloc) = delete;
    };
    

    Note that you need to do the same for operator new[] separately.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any easy way to create a class that uses IFormatProvider that writes
Is there a way to create an instance of a class based on the
Is there a way to create register a handler that will be called exactly
Is there a way to create a JButton with your own button graphic and
Is there any way to create a virtual drive in (My) Computer and manipulate
Is there any way to create the query parameters for doing a GET request
Is there a way to create an html link using h:outputLink, other JSF tag
Is there any way to create C# 3.0 anonymous object via Reflection at runtime
Is there a way to create C# objects and call methods from unmanaged C++,
Is there a way to create a Distinct query in HQL. Either by using

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.