Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6700621
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T06:50:11+00:00 2026-05-26T06:50:11+00:00

Is there a way to do such thing in a makefile for gmake: GOALS

  • 0

Is there a way to do such thing in a makefile for gmake:

GOALS := g1
define fun_one
    @echo "blabla"  #this causes an error - maybe can't be recognized as a recipe
endef

define fun_two
$(1):
$(eval $(call fun_one,$(1)))
endef

$(forech goal, $(GOALS), $(eval $(call fun_two,$(goal))))

all: ${GOALS}

As far as I understand, I can’t define a part of a recipe outside a function that defines a rule, am I write?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T06:50:12+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 6:50 am

    There’s no need for the first eval; it just tells Make to enact that line while it’s still parsing the definition of fun_one. Eliminate the eval and the makefile will work:

    define fun_two
    $(1):
    $(call fun_one,$(1))
    endef
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

...is there any way of checking such thing? The default option as i remember
Is there a way to abort a python write operation in such a way
Is there a way to bundle PowerShell such that I don't have to install
Is there any way to specify optional parameters (such as when search parameters are
Is there a way to specify a Model in Django such that is ensures
Is there any way to determine the local culture of a PC (such as
Is there a way to combine 2 vectors in MATLAB such that: mat =
Is there a way to extend the SPGridView control in a webpart such that
is there any way to hook a debug function into a hook such as
Is there a way to integrate StyleCop in a NAnt script such that the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.