Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8869169
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T17:25:16+00:00 2026-06-14T17:25:16+00:00

Is there a way to force a class to be instantiated on the stack

  • 0

Is there a way to force a class to be instantiated on the stack or at least prevent it to be global in C++?

I want to prevent global instantiation because the constructor calls C APIs that need previous initialization. AFAIK there is no way to control the construction order of global objects.

Edit: The application targets an embedded device for which dynamic memory allocation is also prohibited. The only possible solution for the user to instanciate the class is either on the stack or through a placement new operator.

Edit2: My class is part of a library which depends on other external libraries (from which come the C APIs). I can’t modify those libraries and I can’t control the way libraries are initialized in the final application, that’s why I am looking for a way to restrict how the class could be used.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T17:25:18+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 5:25 pm

    Instead of placing somewhat arbitrary restrictions on objects of your class I’d rather make the calls to the C API safe by wrapping them into a class. The constructor of that class would do the initialization and the destructor would release acquired resources.

    Then you can require this class as an argument to your class and initialization is always going to work out.

    The technique used for the wrapper is called RAII and you can read more about it in this SO question and this wiki page. It originally was meant to combine encapsulate resource initialization and release into objects, but can also be used for a variety of other things.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a way to force a derived class to use the constructor of
I'd like to know if there's any way to force the System.Net.Dns class to
Is there a way to force Jackson not to put the class name in
Possible Duplicate: Is there a way to force a C# class to implement certain
Is there a way to force C# compiler, visual studio 2010, to call a
Is there a way to force VS to use Unicode always, instead of weird
is there some way to force the gridview's pager to show up, even when
Is there a way to force the client to update its local svn configuration
Is there any way to force a Route to be executed, only if all
Is there any way to force a browser to refresh or empty it's cache,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.