Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7186413
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T18:37:34+00:00 2026-05-28T18:37:34+00:00

Is there a way to implement operator->, not only operator*. To have following code

  • 0

Is there a way to implement operator->, not only operator*. To have following code working:

Iterator<value> it = ...
i = (*it).get();
i = it->get(); // also works

Let we say that value type has method get.
When Iterator is implemnted as below:

template<T> class Iterator {
    T operator*() { return ... }
    T operator->()  { return ... }
 }

Here … is an implementation of getting right T object.

Somehow it won’t work when I implement it in this way. I think I misunderstand something.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T18:37:36+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 6:37 pm

    operator-> should return a pointer:

    T * operator->();
    T const * operator->() const;
    

    operator* should return a reference if you want to use it for modification:

    T & operator*();
    T operator*() const; // OR T const & operator*() const;
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

That's basically the question, is there a right way to implement operator<< ? Reading
Is there a way to implement a CHECK constraint that checks a value against
Is there a way to implement a singleton object in C++ that is: Lazily
Is there any way to implement a URL mechanisim in asp.net like it has
Is there a way to implement/use lambda functions in bash? I'm thinking of something
is there any way to implement timeout option for individual tests in a bunch
Is there a way to implement lazy loading with Swing's JList?
Is there any way to implement pop-ups similar to the system ones on iPhone?
Is there a way to implement NSURLConnection without it leaking? A number of Apps
Is there any way to implement something similar to Chatroulette without using Flash or

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.