Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7180521
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T17:21:59+00:00 2026-05-28T17:21:59+00:00

Is there a way to make a leaner HTML/Javascript -oriented build/package of the Mozilla

  • 0

Is there a way to make a leaner HTML/Javascript -oriented build/package of the Mozilla XulRunner components, excluding some of the heavier XUL-platform features?

Background:

We are building a cross-platform application with a HTML/JavaScript GUI. The host app is running on .NET/Mono, and the GUI is rendered using Mozilla XulRunner via the GeckoFx wrapper. Everything is working great.

We have one issue: the XulRunner (9.0.x) components weighing at 28MB make the application installer a bit larger than we’d like. The XulRunner does not need to be deployed separately if the user already has Firefox installed, but we would want to reduce the footprint for the users who don’t.

We’ve already excluded all XulRunner executables from the official release build to get the package down to its current size.

It occurs to me that we are only using a small subset of the XulRunner platform. We do not require any of the XUL features, only HTML, JavaScript and CSS. This leads me to think that we might be able to make a custom build which excludes some of the parts we don’t need, but I’m not well-versed in the Mozilla build arcana.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T17:22:00+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 5:22 pm

    You will typically use build options like --disable-tests (don’t build those test executables) and --enable-optimize/--disable-debug. Also, you should be able to use --disable-xul option. However, you need to be aware that options like --disable-xul create builds that aren’t quite as well tested as the official XULRunner. Other options that should be ok in a simple application:

    --disable-jsd           Disable JavaScript debug library
    --disable-plugins       Disable plugins support
    --disable-view-source   Disable view source support
    --disable-accessibility Disable accessibility support
    --disable-printing      Disable printing support
    --disable-crashreporter Disable breakpad crash reporting
    --disable-mathml        Disable MathML support
    --disable-installer     Disable building of installer
    --disable-updater       Disable building of updater
    --disable-activex       Disable building of ActiveX control
    --disable-activex-scripting  Disable building of ActiveX scripting support (win32)
    --disable-feeds         Disable feed handling and processing components
    

    You can find other options by searching for MOZ_ARG_DISABLE_BOOL in configure.in.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a way make an HTTP request from within JavaScript to a URL
Is there a way to make a TSQL variable constant?
Is there a way to make a Radio Button enabled/disabled (not checked/unchecked) via CSS?
Is there a way to make a popup window maximised as soon as it
Is there a way to make running junit test to stop after a test
Is there a way to make a python module load a dll in my
Is there any way to make Visual Studio 2008 Express store all the files
Is there a way to make sure a (large, 300K) background picture is always
Is there any way to make Visual Studio word-wrap at 80 characters? I'm using
Is there any way to make a function (the ones I'm thinking of are

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.