Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9230889
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T05:55:47+00:00 2026-06-18T05:55:47+00:00

Is there a way to make the compiler ignore this specific warning? Here’s what

  • 0

Is there a way to make the compiler ignore this specific warning?

Here’s what I do:

UIViewController *firstViewController = AppDelegate.instance.viewController;

//open the view of the clicked subItem
if ([firstViewController respondsToSelector:@selector(openView:inView:)]) {
    [firstViewController openView:subItem.itemText.text inView:activeScreen]; //warning on this line
}

I know one way that works is to change UIViewController to ViewController (Name of it’s class). But this fix won’t work in the future, so I’m just looking for a way to ignore this warning.

It won’t work in the future because, I’ll be doing something like this:

//.m

UIViewController *firstViewController;

//.h

if (someCondition) {
firstViewController = AppDelegate.instance.viewController;
}
else{
firstViewController = AppDelegate.instance.otherViewController;
}

if ([firstViewController respondsToSelector:@selector(openView:inView:)]) {
    [firstViewController openView:subItem.itemText.text inView:activeScreen]; //warning on this line
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T05:55:49+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 5:55 am

    You should cast the object to the correct type where appropriate. Note that you can ‘cast’ to a protocol if you like. This gives you the safety of knowing that required methods are implemented without having to know the concrete type.

    If you want to just have the compiler not complain, it’s possible by calling performSelector:. But then you won’t get compile-time checking.

    [object performSelector:@selector(doSomething)]; 
    

    See discussion: Using -performSelector: vs. just calling the method

    If you want to pass exactly one object to your selector, it’s possible by using the variant performSelector:withObject:.

    If you want to pass multiple objects, you’ll have to wrap them up in a container object, as described at iOS – How to implement a performSelector with multiple arguments and with afterDelay?.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a way to make the compiler create the default constructors even if
Is there any way I can make the Go compiler use int64 by default
Is there a way to make Java Exceptions more informative? For example, take this
Is there a way I can make g++ ignore or work around conflicting typedefs?
Is there a way to make the msvc compiler as strict as gcc? MSVC
Is there a way to log the commands, make invokes to compile a program?
Is there a way to make a button's background color change from a color
Is there a way to make MySQL cause some kind of error when doing
Is there a way to make Timeline start recording EXACTLY at the time where
Is there a way to make the SVG version of an image not being

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.