Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4619474
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T02:25:46+00:00 2026-05-22T02:25:46+00:00

Is there a way to make this look a little better? conn.exec ‘select attr1,

  • 0

Is there a way to make this look a little better?

conn.exec 'select attr1, attr2, attr3, attr4, attr5, attr6, attr7 ' +
          'from table1, table2, table3, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, ' +
          'where etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc'

Like, is there a way to imply concatenation?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T02:25:47+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 2:25 am

    There are pieces to this answer that helped me get what I needed (easy multi-line concatenation WITHOUT extra whitespace), but since none of the actual answers had it, I’m compiling them here:

    str = 'this is a multi-line string'\
      ' using implicit concatenation'\
      ' to prevent spare \n\'s'
    
    => "this is a multi-line string using implicit concatenation to eliminate spare
    \\n's"
    

    As a bonus, here’s a version using funny HEREDOC syntax (via this link):

    p <<END_SQL.gsub(/\s+/, " ").strip
    SELECT * FROM     users
             ORDER BY users.id DESC
    END_SQL
    # >> "SELECT * FROM users ORDER BY users.id DESC"
    

    The latter would mostly be for situations that required more flexibility in the processing. I personally don’t like it, it puts the processing in a weird place w.r.t. the string (i.e., in front of it, but using instance methods that usually come afterward), but it’s there. Note that if you are indenting the last END_SQL identifier (which is common, since this is probably inside a function or module), you will need to use the hyphenated syntax (that is, p <<-END_SQL instead of p <<END_SQL). Otherwise, the indenting whitespace causes the identifier to be interpreted as a continuation of the string.

    This doesn’t save much typing, but it looks nicer than using + signs, to me.

    Also (I say in an edit, several years later), if you’re using Ruby 2.3+, the operator <<~ is also available, which removes extra indentation from the final string. You should be able to remove the .gsub invocation, in that case (although it might depend on both the starting indentation and your final needs).

    EDIT: Adding one more:

    p %{
    SELECT * FROM     users
             ORDER BY users.id DESC
    }.gsub(/\s+/, " ").strip
    # >> "SELECT * FROM users ORDER BY users.id DESC"
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any better way to make this query work? I'm looking for a
Is there a way to make this code work? LogonControl.java @Audit(AuditType.LOGON) public void login(String
Is there a way to make this line shorter? bool pass = d !=
Is there any way to make this work in Java? public static void change(List<?
Is there a way to make this method generic so I can return a
Essentially, is there any way to make this code legal? main = print .
MyClass c = 10; Is there any way to make this code work? I
Is there a way to make a class such this one: class DB extends
Is there a way to make the UIPickerView read-only? This means that the user
Is there a way I can put little squares around a div to make

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.