Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1016735
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T10:35:35+00:00 2026-05-16T10:35:35+00:00

Is there a way to prevent shared_from_this() call for a stack-allocated object ? The

  • 0

Is there a way to prevent shared_from_this() call for a stack-allocated object ?

The enable_shared_from_this<> in the base classes list is a strong indicator for class user, but is there a way to enforce the correct usage ?

Example code:

class C : public enable_shared_from_this<C>
{
public:
  shared_ptr<C> method() { return shared_from_this(); }
};

void func()
{
  C c;
  shared_ptr<C> ptr = c.method(); // exception coming from shared_from_this()
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T10:35:35+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 10:35 am

    So to protect against this problem you can make your constructors private and only provide creation functions that return shared_ptr – this way the object can’t be allocated on the stack, like this:

    class C : public enable_shared_from_this<C>
    {
    public:
      static shared_ptr<C> create() { return shared_ptr<C>(new C() ); }
      shared_ptr<C> method() { shared_from_this(); }
    
    private:
      C() {...}
    
      // Make operator= and C(const C&) private unimplemented
      // so the used cant do bad things like C c( * c_ptr );
      C& operator=( const C & );
      C( const C & );
    };
    
    
    void func()
    {
      C c; // This doesn't compile
      shared_ptr<C> ptr = c.method(); // So you can never get this
    }
    
    void altfunc()
    {
      shared_ptr<C> c_ptr = C::create();
      C & c_ref = *c;
      shared_ptr<C>  ptr = c_ref.method(); // OK
    }
    

    If you find yourself wishing for an operator= you can provide a clone function using a private implemented copy constructor, something like this

    // This goes in class C
    shared_ptr<C> C::clone() const
    {
      return shared_ptr<C>( new C(*this) );
    }
    
    // This is how you can use it
    shared_ptr<C> c2 = c1->clone();
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a way to prevent someone from faking a mime type on a
Is there any way to prevent Visual Studio from creating a VSMacros80 folder in
Is there a way to prevent packages in Delphi to implicitly import units that
As the title states, is there a way to prevent extra elements from showing
Is there a way to prevent a line break after a div with css?
Is there an analogous conditional-not-present attribute or maybe a way to use the Conditional
Is there way in next piece of code to only get the first record?
is there way thats i can preselect an item when the page loads or
Is there a way to enforce constraint checking in MSSQL only when inserting new
Is there any way to check whether a file is locked without using a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.