Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 526069
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T08:44:16+00:00 2026-05-13T08:44:16+00:00

Is there a way to prevent users from locking up a linux machine with

  • 0

Is there a way to prevent users from locking up a linux machine with code something along the lines of:

#import <stdio.h>
int main (int argc, char** argv)
{
    while (1)
        fork();
}

The computers in question are in a computer lab, so I can’t exactly disallow compiling… but is there some way of ensuring such processes only consume a certain portion of the system resources? The importance of this issue is compounded by the fact that any user can ssh into any of the systems, so really the only reason this hasn’t become a problem yet is most users are more or less unfamiliar with C or other low-level languages.

Still, I’d like to nip this one in the bud…

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T08:44:16+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 8:44 am

    You can limit the total number of concurrent processes that each user is allowed to create. I think it’s in /etc/security/limits.conf and the NPROC field is what you need to set.

    Update: Just looked it up here and it appears my memory isn’t failing me after all 🙂

    The simplest way is to enter:

    * hard nproc 50
    

    which will limit all users to 50 processes. You may want to have a little more fine-grained control than that.

    Alternatively, you can use ulimit to enforce the limit if limits.conf is not available on your system. You will have to ensure that all started processes are restricted by, for example, putting it into /etc/profile and all other possible entry points:

    ulimit -Hu 50
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 309k
  • Answers 309k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I think you would have more luck if you tried… May 13, 2026 at 9:51 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer replace * with column names create non-clustered index on GI_ID May 13, 2026 at 9:51 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Read the documentation for CGImageCreate(). Basically, you have to create… May 13, 2026 at 9:51 pm

Related Questions

I have a pretty sizeable object graph that I have serialized to a file
I'm looking for a portable interface to POSIX alarm(2) (or similar) in Ruby. That's
I have several applications that are part of a suite of tools that various
How would you prevent the user from adding or removing lines in a TextBox?
I'm about to start a fairly Ajax heavy feature in my company's application. What

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.