Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 400777
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T16:58:21+00:00 2026-05-12T16:58:21+00:00

Is there a way to programmatically add hosts to the local name resolver under

  • 0

Is there a way to programmatically add hosts to the local name resolver under Linux?

I would rather avoid fiddling with /etc/hosts dynamically…

Example: add the name foo and bind it to the local port 127.1.2.3

Use Case: I have an application installed locally accessible through a web browser. I’d like the application to be accessible through a local URI.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T16:58:21+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 4:58 pm

    add the name foo and bind it to the local port 127.0.0.1:9999

    What is it that you want? You can add foo 127.0.0.1 to hosts or do the equivalent in your nameserver, but a connection to foo on port 1234 will always go to 127.0.0.1:1234 — it’s not possible to redirect that to port 9999 based on name, which is lost by the time connect is called.

    On Linux you can add IPs to the loopback device (i.e. ip addr add 127.1.2.3 dev lo), and then use iptables to change all connections destined for 127.1.2.3:1234 to instead go to 127.0.0.1:9999, but I can’t tell from your question if that the observable behavior you want.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.