Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8034609
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T02:04:37+00:00 2026-06-05T02:04:37+00:00

Is there a way to specify in type parameters that a parameter is the

  • 0

Is there a way to specify in type parameters that a parameter is the type of the object instance?

For instance, to illustrate, I have:

public abstract class Model
{
    public int Prop1 { get; set; }
}

For my example, I want to have a method that will return a property of the Model passed in (obviously this is a stupid method, but it gets the point across). I can make it work as an extension method:

public static class Extensions
{
    public static U Property<T, U>(this T model, Expression<Func<T, U>> property) where T : Model
    {
        return property.Compile().Invoke(model);
    }
}

this way I can have

public class DerivedModel : Model
{
    public string Prop2 { get; set; }
}

and do

var myString = new DerivedModel().Property(a => a.Prop2);

This method seems like it should be part of the Model class, and look something like:

public T Property<T>(Expression<Func<ThisDerivedInstanceOfModel, T>> property)
{
    return property.Compile().Invoke(this);
}

so that the same call to Property() that the extension method does can execute on an instance of a Model.

I realize that this is kind of bizarre and may simply not be a feature of C#, and the workaround extension method works perfectly well – but I’d much prefer to make this an instance method if possible, since seems ‘better’ to me.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T02:04:38+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 2:04 am

    Is there a way to specify in type parameters that a parameter is the type of the object instance?

    Nope. Sorry. There are times when I can see it being useful, but it’s not something you can do. I’ve had similar issues in the past 🙁

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any way to specify what specific type of object can be contained
Is there a way to specify type while parsing Json, so that the conversion
Is there any way to specify that a function should be called when a
Is there a way to specify actions like <copy> in an Ant buildfile that
Is there a way to specify in an interface a known return type, but
For simplicity's sake, lets say I have the following Abstract Base Controller Class: public
We can specify a derived from constraint on generic type parameters like this: class
Is there a way to specify default JVM arguments when I'm running my code
Is there any way to specify a width when doing :vsplit? Also, is there
Is there a way to specify which namespace includes should be automatically added any

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.