Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 195313
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T16:40:13+00:00 2026-05-11T16:40:13+00:00

Is there an asynchronous version of DirectoryInfo.GetFiles / Directory.GetDirectories in dotNet? I’d like to

  • 0

Is there an asynchronous version of DirectoryInfo.GetFiles / Directory.GetDirectories in dotNet? I’d like to use them in an F# async block, and it’d be nice to have a version that can be called with AsyncCallbacks.

Problem is I’m trying to suck in a bunch of directories, probably on SMB mounts over slow network connections, and I don’t want a bunch of thread pool threads sitting around waiting for network reads when they could be doing other work.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T16:40:13+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 4:40 pm

    No, I don’t think there is. The pool thread approach is probably the most pragmatic. Alternatively, I guess you could drop down to P/Invoke – but that would be a lot more work.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm trying to use the XFBML version of the Facebook Like button. On a
More generally, given a procedure that has both a synchronous and asynchronous version (like
When invoking a WCF service asynchronous there seems to be two ways it can
There's a Rails 3.2.3 web application which doesn't use any database. But in spite
There are nice SO question and answers about this issue, but these options didn't
I'm trying to add the asynchronous version of the Google Analytics tracking code to
I saw there is a method for synchronous, like if I wanted to do
Is there a compelling reason to offer batch update version of update methods in
I am learning asynchronous programming using C# and I usually use BeginInvoke , but
1) Is there an implementation of the aws sdk which uses asynchronous I/O instead

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.