Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 187553
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T15:50:37+00:00 2026-05-11T15:50:37+00:00

Is there an easy method of accessing custom System.Configuration-based configuration data through a thread-safe

  • 0

Is there an easy method of accessing custom System.Configuration-based configuration data through a thread-safe interface without requiring each execution context from loading/reloading configuration information which would be computationally burdensome?

System.Configuration classes, like most (all?) other classes in Microsoft’s .Net library documentation, are annotated with the following thread-safety information:

Any public static (Shared in Visual Basic) members of this type are thread safe. Any instance members are not guaranteed to be thread safe.

By my reading of this, the ConfigurationSection objects returned from the ConfigurationManager.GetSection(string) and other similar methods (e.g. OpenExeConfiguration(string exePath).GetSection(string)) must not be assumed to be thread-safe and thus should not be used by multiple execution contexts. This prohibits storing a ConfigurationSection in a singleton that would otherwise be thread-safe because while the access to the section object may be safe, the members on the object itself are not safe.

Multiple calls to GetSection, however, are likely to require re-parsing of the configuration files and allocating new ConfigurationSection instances which has a high overhead considering the configuration is not likely to ever change after initialization. Further, copying the configuration data into another object that has been made thread-safe seems to defeat one of the main benefits of using the built-in configuration package in the first place (easy access to type-converted and validated configuration information without much boilerplate code).

So, is there a way to use System.Configuration in a thread-safe manner without resorting to excess parsing and allocations of configuration sections? Does implementing your own ConfigurationSection free you from the lack of guarantee provided by Microsoft even though you’re accessing it through the System.Configuration interfaces (and if so, how would you implement it to be thread-safe when access to the base ConfigurationSection‘s indexer is required for accessing the configured data)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T15:50:38+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 3:50 pm

    The instance returned from GetSection is not thread-safe. That means you need to add locking code in order to use it in your singleton.

    Multiple calls do not re-parse the file, unless the file has changed. The data are cached in memory.

    Your thread safety problem is easily solved by using locking (I’m not sure you’ll need to, unless you’re changing the configuration at runtime), and there is no performance problem.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any easy/general way to clean an XML based data source prior to
Is there an easy method to store a person's user settings in a sql
Is there an easy way to iterate over an associative array of this structure
Is there an easy way in C# to create Ordinals for a number? For
Is there an easy way to produce MSDN-style documentation from the Visual Studio XML
Is there an easy way to avoid dealing with text encoding problems?
Is there an easy way to tell if a ruby script is already running
Is there an easy way to set the zoom level for a windows form
Is there an easy way to read an entire Access file (.mdb) into a
Is there an easy way of using the RegularExpressionValidator control while ignoring white space?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.