Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8217181
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T12:22:42+00:00 2026-06-07T12:22:42+00:00

Is there an efficient way to run nested for loops, avoiding any of the

  • 0

Is there an efficient way to run nested for loops, avoiding any of the counters having the same value. Obviously, I could run some if statements, as below, but is there a more efficient way?

for i = 1 to 20:
    for j = 1 to 20:
        if (i == j):
            continue
        else:            
            for k = 1 to 20:
                if (i == k) or (j == k):
                    continue
                else:
                    do something useful with these different numbers

EDIT: The variables are not interchangeable, so [2, 1, 0] is different to [0, 1, 2]. The “do something useful” will be about 6 numerical checks on the numbers, involving adding, squaring, and square rooting them.

Thanks, and sorry about the possibly unusual pseudocode (and the constant editing).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T12:22:43+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 12:22 pm

    That looks like the most efficient way you can do it. What’s wrong with how you have it?

    I’m just going to ignore the part where I can’t think of any reason to ever need to do this…. so if you have a specific case please share? Unless your trying to compare an item to all other items in a list that isn’t itself I guess?

    which could be done as

    list = {1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4} \\where list[0] will return 1, and list.size() will return 8
    for(int i = 0; i < list.size()-1; i++){
        for(int j = i + 1; j < list.size(); j++){
            System.out.println(list[i] + "," + list[j]);
        }
    }
    

    That way you dont repeat comparisons between things you have already compared.

    For three nests

    list = {1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4} \\where list[0] will return 1, and list.size() will return 8
    for(int i = 0; i < list.size()-2; i++){
        for(int j = i + 1; j < list.size()-1; j++){
            for(int k = j + 1; j < list.size(); k++){
                System.out.println(list[i] + "," + list[j] + "," + list[k]);
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any way we could do efficient paging with petapoco and mvc3. At
Is there an efficient way to version store procedures written in PL/SQL? (I only
Is there an efficient way to clone an object yet leave out specified properties?
Is there a more efficient way to list files from a bucket in Amazon
Is there are more efficient way than the following for selecting the third parent?
I'm curious if there is an efficient way to wait for the front page
If I have a standard for loop is there a more efficient way to
I'm wondering if there's a super-efficient way of confirming that an Image object references
Is there a built-in php function, or a simple (efficient!) way to combine built-in
I have many 100x100 grids, is there an efficient way using numpy to calculate

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.