Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 836391
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T04:58:25+00:00 2026-05-15T04:58:25+00:00

Is there an efficient way with given two nodes to find a set of

  • 0

Is there an efficient way with given two nodes to find a set of their common nodes (with defined relationships).

For example, having nodes A1, B1, C1–C4 connected with relationships x and y:

A1 --x--> C1
A1 --x--> C2
A1 --x--> C3
B1 --y--> C2
B1 --y--> C3
B1 --y--> C4

a common node set for A1(x) and B1(y) would be [C2, C3].

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T04:58:26+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 4:58 am

    In many cases the structure of the domain can be leveraged to improve performance. Let’s say that you know that in general your A entities have less x relationships compared to the number of y relationships on the B entities. Then you could traverse two steps from the A node and see where the B node shows up, and filter out the C nodes this way. Here’s some code for this approach:

    Set<Node> found = new HashSet<Node>();
    for ( Relationship firstRel : a1.getRelationships( Reltypes.x, Direction.OUTGOING ) )
    {
        Node cNode = firstRel.getEndNode();
        for ( Relationship secondRel : cNode.getRelationships( Reltypes.y, Direction.INCOMING ) )
        {
            Node bNode = secondRel.getStartNode();
            if ( bNode.equals( b1 ) )
            {
                found.add( cNode );
                break;
            }
        }
    }
    

    Another way would be to start two threads that scan the relationships from either side.

    A third approach would be to create a specialized index that would help answering this kind of queries, which would obviously hurt insert performance.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.