Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1111715
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T02:35:30+00:00 2026-05-17T02:35:30+00:00

Is there an elegant notation for Currying the arguments of a function out of

  • 0

Is there an elegant notation for Currying the arguments of a function out of order in Haskell?

For example, if you wish to divide 2 by all elements of a list, you can write

map ((/) 2) [1,2,3,4,5]

However to divide all elements of a list it seems you need to define an anonymous function

map (\x -> x/2) [1,2,3,4,5]

Anonymous functions quickly become unwieldy in more complex cases. I’m aware that in this case map ((*) 0.5) [1,2,3,4,5] would work fine, but I’m interested to know if Haskell has a more elegant way of currying arguments of a function out of order?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T02:35:32+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 2:35 am

    In this particular case:

    Prelude> map (/2) [1..5]
    [0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0,2.5]
    

    Not only you can use an infix operator as ordinary prefix function, you can also partially apply it in infix form. Likewise, the first example would better be written as map (2/) [1..5]

    Also, there’s flip which is not quite as elegant, but still the best option available for ordinary functions (when you don’t want to turn them into infix via backticks):

    Prelude> let div' = (/)
    Prelude> div' 2 1
    2.0
    Prelude> flip div' 2 1
    0.5
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.