Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8582503
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T21:18:27+00:00 2026-06-11T21:18:27+00:00

Is there an idiomatic analog to Ruby’s Object#tap for Unix command pipelines? Use case:

  • 0

Is there an idiomatic analog to Ruby’s Object#tap for Unix command pipelines?

Use case: within a pipeline I want to execute a command for its side effects but return the input implicitly so as to not break the chaining of the pipeline. For example:

echo { 1, 2, 3 } |
  tr ' ' '\n' |
  sort |
  tap 'xargs echo' | # arbitrary code, but implicitly return the input
  uniq

I’m coming from Ruby, where I would do this:

[ 1, 2, 3 ].
  sort.
  tap { |x| puts x }.
  uniq
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T21:18:29+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 9:18 pm

    The tee command is similar; it writes its input to standard output as well as one or more files. If that file is a process substitution, you get the same effect, I believe.

    echo 1 2 3 | tr ' ' '\n' | sort | tee >( **code** ) | uniq
    

    The code in the process substitution would read from its standard input, which should be the same thing that the call to uniq ends up seeing.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

There's a Rails 3.2.3 web application which doesn't use any database. But in spite
Is there an idiomatic way to bind variables in a MATLAB function? It seems
Is there an idiomatic way to get available namespaces that can be used? (all-ns)
What is the (or is there an) idiomatic way to strip newlines from strings
I'm learning WPF, and am wondering if there's an idiomatic way to create a
Given a dictionary-like object in Javascript such as {a:1, b:-2, c:42} , is there
Is there an idiomatic way of doing this?
Is there a more idiomatic/readable way of writing a get-and-set function in Clojure than:
Is there idiomatic and/or elegant Python for zipping and applying a list of functions
Is there a idiomatic way of removing elements from PATH-like shell variables? That is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.