Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 687855
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T02:10:12+00:00 2026-05-14T02:10:12+00:00

Is there any ability to mock methods that are provided with RIA Services? I

  • 0

Is there any ability to mock methods that are provided with RIA Services?

I would like to test my Silverlight App without communication to the server side…

I see a following approach:

  • create a separate interface;
  • add it to “base classes” for my RiaService;
  • define each autogenerated RIA-method in this interface;
  • insert dependency so that my “functionality” will depend not from the RiaService, but from the interface that is implemented with RiaService.

But for this case I see a problem: how to keep my interface in the auto-generated files?

ANy thoughts are welcome.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T02:10:12+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 2:10 am

    A few relatively unrelated (to each other) thoughts…

    1. If the auto-generated files are partial classes, you could simply add another partial class to define that it implements an interface.
    2. You could use StructureMap to inject dependencies to Moq objects to do what you want.
    3. Use generics in an interesting way to allow you to use either the generated class or the mocked object. (probably not a good solution)
    4. Use reflection to work with the two different object types. (probably not a good option)
    5. Compile directives (#if DEBUG) to use the two different object types. (definitely not a good option)

    Hope this either helps or inspires some good/better ideas!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Aside from DeployerFTP, are there any plugins that offer the ability to deploy a
Is there any way to check whether a file is locked without using a
Is there any free or commercial component written in .NET (no COM interop) that
Is there any ability to build maven artifact which will contain only resources but
Is there any query which can return me the number of revisions made to
Is there any efficiency difference in an explicit vs implicit inner join? For example:
Is there any way to capture the MouseDown even from the .NET 2.0 TextBox
Is there any difference between int on_exit(void (*function)(int , void *), void *arg); and
Is there any known way of listing the WMI classes and their properties available
Is there any reason not to use the bitwise operators &, |, and ^

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.