Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4092592
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T19:30:39+00:00 2026-05-20T19:30:39+00:00

is there any convenient way execute tests on multiple data sets – like in

  • 0

is there any convenient way execute tests on multiple data sets – like in JUnit’s parametrized tests?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T19:30:39+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 7:30 pm

    There’s a new feature for testing multiple data sets coming in ScalaTest 1.5, which you can currently try as a snapshot. It is released at scala-tools.org:

    group id: org.scalatest
    artifact id: scalatest
    version: 1.5-SNAPSHOT

    You mix in (or import the members of) TableDrivenPropertyChecks, then you can define tables like this:

    val examples =
      Table(
        ("a", "b", "c", "d"),
        (  1,   1,   1,   1),
        (  1,   1,   1,   1),
        (  1,   1,   1,   1),
        (  1,   1,   1,   1)
      )
    

    You pass a var arg list of tuples to Table. Each tuple has to have the same arity, in this case each tuple has arity 4 (4 members). The first tuple is all strings, and these define names for the columns. The subsequent tuples each define one row of data. You can put any type in the tuple, but in general each column would contain the same type. Though if you wanted you could have columns of type Any that can contain anything. You can have table with 1 to 22 columns. If you need more than 22 columns (the max tuple size in Scala is currently 22), what you could do is use a compound type in one or more columns.

    Once you have a table, you can check them with forAll like this:

    forAll (examples) { (a, b, c, d) =>
      a + b + c + d should equal (4)
    }
    

    forAll takes two parameter lists. The first is a table and the second is a “property function,” which expresses something that should be true for every row of the table. forAll will take each row of the table (skipping the heading row of column names, of course) and make sure the property holds. If it doesn’t, you get a nice error message saying which row of the table failed, what the values of the named columns were, etc.

    A Table is a Seq of the data tuples, so you can also use it like a Seq. For example, you could get a Seq of Option[Exception] indicating which rows failed like this:

    for ((a, b, c, d) <- examples) yield {
      failureOf { a + b + c + d should equal (4) }
    }
    

    The resulting Seq contains one Option for each row of data in the table, which is a None if the property passed for that row, and Some[Exception] if the property failed. The exception in the Some contains all the details about the failure.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any way to check whether a file is locked without using a
Is there any way to capture the MouseDown even from the .NET 2.0 TextBox
Is there any known way of listing the WMI classes and their properties available
Is there any way to apply an attribute to a model file in ASP.NET
Is there any good way to deal with the class renaming refactor from Resharper
Is there any free or commercial component written in .NET (no COM interop) that
Is there any query which can return me the number of revisions made to
Is there any efficiency difference in an explicit vs implicit inner join? For example:
Is there any difference between int on_exit(void (*function)(int , void *), void *arg); and
Is there any reason not to use the bitwise operators &, |, and ^

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.