Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6967679
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T16:21:10+00:00 2026-05-27T16:21:10+00:00

Is there any drawback to putting code (which will interact with the DOM, adding

  • 0

Is there any drawback to putting code (which will interact with the DOM, adding event listeners and so on) just before the closing </body> tag?

<!-- all the HTML comes before this -->
(function() {
  do_stuff_with_the_DOM();
})();
</body>

It seems to work in my own tests, but I never see this method used in tutorials, code examples, or other people’s projects. Is there a reason not to do it? Are there edge cases that only seem to pop up when you begin using this in production and see many page views across a variety of browsers?

My project doesn’t use jQuery or any other toolkit, and I’m aware of the alternatives that mimic jQuery’s $(document).ready() functionality. Do I really need to use one of those? (It should go without saying, but I’m looking to run the code before window.load.)

Note that the code I want to run (do_stuff_with_the_DOM() in the example above) would be defined in an external script file, if that makes a difference.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T16:21:11+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 4:21 pm

    You should put your JavaScript code in the place that makes the most sense for what it needs to do. In most cases, you need your js to attach events to DOM objects, which is hard to imagine if those DOM objects don’t exist when the js is running. So putting it at the bottom of the html is a sensible, simple, and common approach. Is it the best? That’s arguable.

    Another approach is to attach your JavaScript to the various events that different browsers fire when the DOM is fully loaded. There is nothing wrong with this, although detractors don’t like that it’s often done in a way that requires an additional blocking HTTP request in the head element.

    Event delegation offers a third approach that lets you attach events to parent elements (such as body) very early, and when appropriate child events exist the events will fire as if they had been attached to those elements all along. It’s a very cool approach with theoretically the best early-loading performance of any of the above, but has pitfalls in that not all events bubble all the way to the top, like you might expect, and that it often tempts you to separate your JavaScript into multiple chunks, which can violate separation of content and behavior.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any drawback (except allowing the value or array to grow too large)
Is there any drawback to this setup? I want to be able to run
Is there any cost/drawback (apart from typing too much) to adorning a class with
Is there any query which can return me the number of revisions made to
Is there any drawback for omitting .ToString() while converting numeric values to string ?
Is there any drawback (performance/maintenance etc.,) in having all setter functions as SLOTS in
Is there any drawback in Symfony when generating modules without the --non-verbose-templates option? I
there is any drawback in choose C++ and an object oriented model (classes) to
I'm using EPIC, but it seems to have some drawbacks. Are there any other
Is there any way to check whether a file is locked without using a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.