Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6764549
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T14:36:26+00:00 2026-05-26T14:36:26+00:00

Is there any easier way of checking one variables value against several others? Currently

  • 0

Is there any easier way of checking one variables value against several others? Currently I’m using code like this:

if(a[i] == a[i-13] || a[i] == a[i+13] || a[i] == a[i-1] || a[i] == a[i+1]){
  //my code
}

Now, is there a shorter way to do this? I know I can use a switch, but then I’d have to write my function several times. Is there an easier way of doing this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T14:36:26+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 2:36 pm

    You do not need to write your function several times with a switch:

    switch(a[i]){
      case a[i-13]:
      case a[i+13]:
      case a[i-1]:
      case a[i+1]:
        // This code will run if any of the above cases are true.
    }
    

    Amusingly, however, this is just about the same number of characters (depending on how you format it). A switch statement in general is less powerful than an explicit if statement, but in this case I find it clearer and less error-prone.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm trying to compose a dynamic URL, is there any easier way to append
Is there any way we can fetch X509 Public Cetrificates using c# from AD
is there any easier way to select & sort by weight ? fetchCount =
Is there any easier way to set to process only those input fields within
Is there any easier way of detecting a swipe motion and its direction without
Like described in title, is there any way to format huge number like 1,000,000
Is there any easier way to do the following in c? unsigned short check_str(char
Is there any easier way of writing sql to replace all columns names with
Is there any way to cut a video (mp4 or 3gp) on android, like
Is there any easier way of understanding how the numerous ways of formatting in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.