Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 364993
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T13:29:30+00:00 2026-05-12T13:29:30+00:00

Is there any guarantee that the array of filenames returned from a glob (e.g.

  • 0

Is there any guarantee that the array of filenames returned from a glob (e.g. <*>) will be sorted?

I can’t find that sorting is mentioned one way or the other in the documentation, but it seems to be the case in every directory I’ve tried it on.

I’m talking about using this syntax:

@files = <*>;

If I need the files to be sorted, would the below be redundant?

@files = sort(<*>);
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T13:29:31+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 1:29 pm

    In Perl 5.6.0 and newer, filenames are sorted:

    Beginning with v5.6.0, this operator
    is implemented using the standard
    File::Glob extension.

    — perldoc for glob

    By default, the pathnames are sorted
    in ascending ASCII order.

    — perldoc for File::Glob

    There is one catch:

    By default, file names are assumed to
    be case sensitive

    — perldoc for File::Glob

    Having said all that, you can change this behavior to sort case-insensitively with

    use File::Glob qw(:globally :nocase);
    

    Note that :globally is redundant since 5.6.0, but this will work on older versions as well.

    Alternately, if you just want to do a single glob with case-insensitivity:

    use File::Glob ':glob';
    
    @files = bsd_glob('*', GLOB_NOCASE);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.