Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8139575
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T11:52:13+00:00 2026-06-06T11:52:13+00:00

Is there any implementation (or straightforward description) of a training algorithm for feed-forward neural

  • 0

Is there any implementation (or straightforward description) of a training algorithm for feed-forward neural networks which doesn’t use a sigmoid or linear squash-function, but a non-differentiable one, such as the heaviside-function?

I already found a paper on such an algorithm, but no according implementation, which I find bewildering, as it seems to me, there should be something out.

Any hints?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T11:52:15+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 11:52 am

    Backpropagation will not work with the heavyside function because its derivate is zero in all the domain, except for the point zero, where it is infinite. That is, the derivative of the heavyside function is the Dirac delta.

    The consequence of this is that there is no change for any value other than zero and no progress can be made. At the point zero, the derivate is infinite, so the step is not manageable either.

    You can find online an implementation for this function in Java, but I still don’t think that it is a good idea to use it. If you increase the gama power in the sigmoid function, it becomes a very decent approximation of the heavyside function with the added benefit of differentiability.

    Check this paper at see if it has any information that might be of help to you.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any fast implementation of cryptographically secure pseudorandom number generator (CSPRNG) for C#
Is there any other implementation (e.g. in an OSS project) of a Java SecurityManager
Is there any rabin fingerprint implementation using .NET?
Is there any bittorrent protocol implementation for C#?
Are there any other STaX Writer implementation for C/C++ except libxml2?
Are there any benchmarks that can be used to check if implementation of ANN
Is there any speed/space/general performance gains in using array based implementation of a binary
Is there any reliable and simple priority queue (linked list preferred, not necessary) implementation
Does any one know if there is kinda implementation/addon for VS 2008 SP1 for
Is there any implementation of JVM that supports CUDA? Provide links please =)

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.