Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8843527
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T11:14:47+00:00 2026-06-14T11:14:47+00:00

Is there any other way to override a prototype function while still calling the

  • 0

Is there any other way to override a prototype function while still calling the base function and inherit its constructor other than what I’m doing below?

function MyFoo(name) {
    this.name = name;
}
MyFoo.prototype.sayName = function() {
    alert("Hi, my name is " + this.name + ".");
}

MyBar.constructor = MyFoo;
MyBar.prototype = new MyFoo();

function MyBar(name) {
    MyFoo.apply(this, arguments);
};

MyBar.prototype.sayName = function() {
    MyFoo.prototype.sayName.call(this);
    alert("It's nice to meet you!");
}

var fooJim = new MyFoo("Jim");
var barJake = new MyBar("Jake");

fooJim .sayName();
barJake .sayName();

This works fine, but I’m just curious if there is a more efficient way to do it.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T11:14:48+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 11:14 am

    No, your approach to emulate class inheritance is intrinsically as minimalist at the JavaScript language allows.

    If you want to make a massive usage of class inheritance in your application and want to minimize redundant code, you might either:

    • Write your own set of utility methods to manipulate the “classes”.
    • Or google for “javascript oop frameworks” to find a library suitable for your need.

    I also can’t help to advice this book (hope it won’t be considered as spam): “JavaScript Patterns” by Stoyan Stefanov. It has a very good chapter on different technics to emulate class inheritance in javascript.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Other than querystring, is there any other way to pass a value with the
Is there any other way in java to implement call backs apart from inner
Is there any other way to change the QTextLayout of a QTextBlock that is
Is there any other way to write javascript:false that is more pleasant? I'm building
Is there any other way of creating a conditional execution? way 1 : the
is there any other way to know if the java String contains character-encoding in
Is there any other way to get datetime field from oracle database in 24hour
Is there any other better way to fill up the array like : var
Does anyone know there have any other way that (by not using json_encode and
is there any other simple,nicer way? require 'pp' a1 = [02/28/10,Webinars,131,0,26 Feb 2010,0,3d, 8h,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.