Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 917455
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T18:12:55+00:00 2026-05-15T18:12:55+00:00

Is there any particular reason why chrome does not respect display:inline when it’s used

  • 0

Is there any particular reason why chrome does not respect "display:inline" when it’s used on "<table>" and is there a known workaround? Everything works fine in firefox but for some reason chrome refuses to do the right thing when I type

<table style="display:inline;">
    table stuff
</table>

firefox alignment: firefox alignment http://dkarapet.userworld.com/cart_noDB/firefox_alignment.png

chrome alignment: chrome alignment http://dkarapet.userworld.com/cart_noDB/chrome_alignment.png

Both versions use the same html source that sets the display property to inline. The tables individually are not wrapped inside any other div and they are all enclosed inside one big div. Here’s the pastie for the relevant part of the html.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T18:12:56+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 6:12 pm

    To pull of what you’re after, you just need to add this to every td:

    <td valign="top">
    

    That will force everything to the top of each cell and will force things to display inline, how you want them to. No CSS needed here.

    It SHOULD be coded like this:

    <table>
     <tr>
      <td valign="top">item 1 info</td>
      <td valign="top">item 2 info</td>
      <td valign="top">item 3 info</td>
     </tr>
     <tr>
      <td valign="top">item 4 info</td>
      <td valign="top">item 5 info</td>
      <td valign="top">item 6 info</td>
     </tr>
    </table>
    

    edit: Or if (for some reason) you’re not using TR and TD’s you can try this:

    <table style="vertical-align:top;">
        table stuff
    </table>
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any particular reason? Is it not possible at all or is it
Presuming that your C++ compiler supports them, is there any particular reason not to
Is there any particular reason for != to be used more than == ?
I there any particular reason about MySQL not allowing the use of date_sent_at in
Is there any particular reason why this kind of literal is not included whereas
Is there any particular reason that all data members in a class are private
Is there any way to tell GCC to not initialize a particular global array
Is there any particular reason why these are missing? They do exist in BigInteger
Is there any particular reason to use one over the other or it's all
Is there any particular reason to deny the use of magic constants (like __DIR__

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.