Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 91069
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T22:58:20+00:00 2026-05-10T22:58:20+00:00

Is there any performance penalty for the following code snippet? for (int i=0; i<someValue;

  • 0

Is there any performance penalty for the following code snippet?

for (int i=0; i<someValue; i++) {     Object o = someList.get(i);     o.doSomething; } 

Or does this code actually make more sense?

Object o; for (int i=0; i<someValue; i++) {     o = someList.get(i);     o.doSomething; } 

If in byte code these two are totally equivalent then obviously the first method looks better in terms of style, but I want to make sure this is the case.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T22:58:20+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 10:58 pm

    In today’s compilers, no. I declare objects in the smallest scope I can, because it’s a lot more readable for the next guy.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Does anyone know if there is any performance penalty if one compiles C code
Are there any performance/other implications in having an object relates to itself? (self join)
Are there any performance difference between decimal(10,0) unsigned type and int(10) unsigned type?
Is there any performance difference between using int a=a+1 and a++ in Java ?
Is there any performance difference between the following two statements? from item in collection
Is there any performance advantage of using content type application/json sending an object serialized
Following on from this question: Run WCF ServiceHost with multiple contracts Are there any
Is there a performance penalty when using a SecurityManager? I need the following: public
Is there any performance penalty in using the var declaration in c# 3.0+? Resharper
Is there any performance penalty to define all methods as transactional using Spring AOP

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.