Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3241564
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T18:12:48+00:00 2026-05-17T18:12:48+00:00

Is there any reason for Scala not support the ++ operator to increment primitive

  • 0

Is there any reason for Scala not support the ++ operator to increment primitive types by default?
For example, you can not write:

var i=0
i++

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T18:12:49+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 6:12 pm

    My guess is this was omitted because it would only work for mutable variables, and it would not make sense for immutable values. Perhaps it was decided that the ++ operator doesn’t scream assignment, so including it may lead to mistakes with regard to whether or not you are mutating the variable.

    I feel that something like this is safe to do (on one line):

    i++
    

    but this would be a bad practice (in any language):

    var x = i++
    

    You don’t want to mix assignment statements and side effects/mutation.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'd like to write a type alias to shorten, nice and encapsulated Scala code.
I am using the Scala 2.8 default parameters on a constructor, and for Java
We have a Scala server that is getting a node tree using Protocol Buffers
In Scala, the interaction of overloading and implicit argument resolution seem to make it
I recently bought Programming Scala , and have been reading through it. The language
What are the advantages of OOP subtyping over typeclasses, if any? In other words,
I am trying to convert a colored BMP file to gray-scale BMP. The input
I'm using core-plot (and the barcharts) to display financial information. My problem is that
I have a routine that will be creating individual tables (Sql Server 2008) to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.