Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1105115
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T01:34:51+00:00 2026-05-17T01:34:51+00:00

Is there any reason that the compiler cannot optimize the following 2 statements out

  • 0

Is there any reason that the compiler cannot optimize the following 2 statements out in main even I turned on fully optimization in Visual C++? Any side effect to access a int variable in memory?

int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[])
{
    volatile int pleaseOptimizeMeOut = 100;

    (pleaseOptimizeMeOut);

    return 0;
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T01:34:52+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 1:34 am

    It can’t optimise them out because you have declared the variable to be volatile. Loads and stores to volatile qualified objects are part of the “externally visible” effects of the C abstract machine.

    (By the way, there are plenty of side effects when accessing a variable in memory; it can update hardware memory caches including the TLB, and possibly also cause page faults. And the memory your process is executing in might be being snooped on by another process, like a debugger).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any (technical) reason that C# requires all generic type parameters to be
Is there any reason not to set up the install so that major upgrade
Is there any reason to prefer a CharBuffer to a char[] in the following:
There is something that I cannot understand in C#. You can cast an out-of-range
Is there any reason not to use the bitwise operators &, |, and ^
Is there any reason something like this would not work? This is the logic
Is there any reason why I should pick JSON over XML, or vice-versa if
Is there any reason to use a varchar field instead of a date field
Is there any reason to start a GUI program (application for Windows) written in
Is there any reason for the use of 'T' in generics? Is it some

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.