Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 406933
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T17:32:42+00:00 2026-05-12T17:32:42+00:00

Is there any reason to prefer static_cast<> over C style casting? Are they equivalent?

  • 0

Is there any reason to prefer static_cast<> over C style casting? Are they equivalent? Is there any sort of speed difference?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T17:32:42+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 5:32 pm

    C++ style casts are checked by the compiler. C style casts aren’t and can fail at runtime.

    Also, C++ style casts can be searched for easily, whereas it’s really hard to search for C style casts.

    Another big benefit is that the 4 different C++ style casts express the intent of the programmer more clearly.

    When writing C++ I’d pretty much always use the C++ ones over the the C style.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any reason to prefer one of the following notations over the others
Does (int)myDouble ever differ from (int)Math.Truncate(myDouble) ? Is there any reason I should prefer
Is there any reason to prefer one of these methods of implementing a global
Is there any reason to prefer a CharBuffer to a char[] in the following:
Is there any reason to prefer unicode(somestring, 'utf8') as opposed to somestring.decode('utf8') ? My
Is there any reason to prefer the syntax \(myformula\) to the usual $myformula$ in
is there any reason to use the post-redirect-get (prg) for a request that you
Is there any reason why the below won't work, it seems to work on
Is there any reason for calling close methods on the StreamWriter class? Why do
Is there any reason why I should close the connection after a query or

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.