Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6047893
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T07:24:09+00:00 2026-05-23T07:24:09+00:00

Is there any reason why .NET’s Reflection API uses arrays instead of indexers to

  • 0

Is there any reason why .NET’s Reflection API uses arrays instead of indexers to access a type’s members/methods/properties/etc.? I understand the overhead of adding collection objects classes such as MemberInfoCollection, MethodInfoCollection, etc. However, these collection objects classes could be created instantiated on demand. Was the design rationale something other than just “dissuade programmers from using Reflection unless they really need it”?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T07:24:09+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 7:24 am

    These APIs were created in .Net 1.0, which didn’t have generics.

    They couldn’t just return a ReadOnlyCollection<MemberInfo>, and they were too lazy to create a separate typed collection class for each type they need to return.

    (I don’t have a source for this belief)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any reason for calling close methods on the StreamWriter class? Why do
is there any reason (safety?) why someone should rename the ASP.NET Session Cookie Name
In ASP.NET, is there any reason not to make a set of functions that
Is there any reason to use one versioning style over the other for .NET
is there any reason to use the post-redirect-get (prg) for a request that you
Is there any reason why the below won't work, it seems to work on
Is there any reason why I should close the connection after a query or
Is there any reason why this shouldn't work? [PseudoCode] main() { for (int i
Is there any reason why images are not being displayed if I place it
Is there any reason to use Spring MVC (or other similar frameworks) as a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.