Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 704665
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T03:58:00+00:00 2026-05-14T03:58:00+00:00

Is there any way, given a function passed as a parameter, to alter its

  • 0

Is there any way, given a function passed as a parameter, to alter its input parameter string before evaluating it?

Here’s pseudo-code for what I’m hoping to achieve:

test.func <- function(a, b) {
    # here I want to alter the b expression before evaluating it:
    b(..., val1=a)
}

Given the function call passed to b, I want to add in a as another parameter without needing to always specify ... in the b call. So the output from this test.func call should be:

test.func(a="a", b=paste(1, 2))
"1"  "2"  "a"

Edit:

Another way I could see doing something like this would be if I could assign the additional parameter within the scope of the parent function (again, as pseudo-code); in this case a would be within the scope of t1 and hence t2, but not globally assigned:

t2 <- function(...) {
  paste(a=a, ...)
}

t1 <- function(a, b) {
  local( { a <<- a; b } )
}

t1(a="a", b=t2(1, 2))

This is somewhat akin to currying in that I’m nesting the parameter within the function itself.

Edit 2:

Just to add one more comment to this: I realize that one related approach could be to use “prototype-based programming” such that things would be inherited (which could be achieved with the proto package). But I was hoping for a easier way to simply alter the input parameters before evaluating in R.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T03:58:01+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 3:58 am

    Have you check substitute? I don’t know it satisfies you needs but you could use fact that it returns hidden list structure which you can modify as below

    test.func <- function(a, b) {
        f <- substitute(b)
        f[["val1"]] <- a
        eval(f)
    }
    
    test.func(a="a", b=paste(1, 2))
    # "1 2 a"
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 425k
  • Answers 425k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I'm guessing that maybe you need to use .each() like… May 15, 2026 at 12:14 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I would do c = (x >> 8) & 0xff… May 15, 2026 at 12:14 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you are assuming a bell curve distribution of events,… May 15, 2026 at 12:14 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.