Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 127699
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T05:31:05+00:00 2026-05-11T05:31:05+00:00

Is there any way (through a extention mechanism?) to get the Sum() function to

  • 0

Is there any way (through a extention mechanism?) to get the Sum() function to allways return 0.

My workaround now is to write like this, but I’m hoping there’s a better solution?

((int?)e.CampaignCodes.Sum(f => f.Enquiries.Count()) ?? 0), 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T05:31:05+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 5:31 am

    Your workaround there is a good one. Why don’t you write an extension method for IEnumerable similar to Sum called something like SumOrDefault. Then you could just reuse your extension method and you will not have to see the workaround.

    Your extension method will be very simple and just use the exact code from your workaround.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any simple way how to draw obliquely strike through on TextView? Now
Is there any standard way of implementing some sort of a write-through buffer for
If I am walking through an IEnumerable<T> , is there any way to get
I was wondering if there was any way through C# or C++ to send
Is there any way of finding the signature of a called method through call
Is there any way to access a movie plaing in VLC through HTTP in
Is there any way to programatically access, through the Twitter API or otherwise, the
Opah! Is there any way I can call a method in the controller through
Is there any possible way to apply more than CSS to a control through
Is there any way to write error log or exception into a file in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.