Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 690179
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T02:24:33+00:00 2026-05-14T02:24:33+00:00

Is there ever reason to think the >> (signed) and >>> (unsigned) right bit-shift

  • 0

Is there ever reason to think the >> (signed) and >>> (unsigned) right bit-shift operators in Java would perform differently? I can’t detect any difference on my machine.

This is purely an academic question; it’s never going to be the bottleneck I’m sure. I know: it’s best to write what you mean foremost; use >> for division by 2, for example.

I assume it comes down to which architectures have which operations implemented as an instruction.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T02:24:33+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 2:24 am

    No.
    Your compiler will translate these to bytecode and the JVM will interpret the bytecode for your architecture. I think it is safe to assume that your architecture has an instruction set which includes both operations be done in few clock cycles.

    Anyway, there is a difference in the behavior of these operators, so it isn’t like you can just interchange them.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there ever a reason to use Type parameters over generics, ie: // this...
Does (int)myDouble ever differ from (int)Math.Truncate(myDouble) ? Is there any reason I should prefer
Does anyone know if there will ever be a true 64-bit version of Cygwin?
I'm a bit puzzled by this one. There are some methods in the Java
Is there ever a reason to use a named self invoking function? For example:
Have you ever obfuscated your code before? Are there ever legitimate reasons to do
Is there ever a circumstance where the .MYI files should be bigger than my
Is there ever a case where a comparison ( equals() ) between two floating
What is the difference between type(obj) and obj.__class__ ? Is there ever a possibility
If there was ever a time to hate IE, this is it. This code

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.