Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 794921
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T22:23:36+00:00 2026-05-14T22:23:36+00:00

Is there in the STL or in Boost a set of generic simple comparison

  • 0

Is there in the STL or in Boost a set of generic simple comparison functions?

The one I found are always requiring template parameters, and/or instantiation of a
struct template.

I’m looking for something with a syntax like :

if ( is_equal(x,y) )
{
   ...
}

Which could be implemented as :

template <typename T>
bool is_equal(const T& x, const T& y)
{
    return ( fabs(x - y) < Precision<T>::eps );
}

EDIT: I changed the operator to equal. (see comments below)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T22:23:36+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 10:23 pm

    I don’t know of any library that does it, perhaps because it is as simple as a one-liner or perhaps because it was forgotten…

    As generality goes though, are you sure you’d like to set up the epsilon for one given type at a given value… throughout the application ? Personally I’d like to customize it depending on the operations I am doing (even though a default would be nice).

    As for your operators, why not devising them yourself ?

    template <class T>
    bool rough_eq(T lhs, T rhs, T epsilon = Precision<T>::epsilon) // operator==
    { 
      return fabs(lhs - rhs) < epsilon;
    }
    
    template <class T>
    bool rough_lt(T lhs, T rhs, T epsilon = Precision<T>::epsilon) // operator<
    {
      return rhs - lhs >= epsilon;
           // tricky >= because if the difference is equal to epsilon
           // then they are not equal per the rough_eq method
    }
    
    template <class T>
    bool rough_lte(T lhs, T rhs, T epsilon = Precision<T>::epsilon) // operator<=
    {
      return rhs - lhs > -epsilon;
    }
    

    The inequality and greater than methods can be trivially derived from this.

    The additional parameter means that you may wish to specify another value for a given set of computations… an application-wide setting is too strict.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a data structure (readily available in STL or boost), that accepts two
Is there C++ equivalent for python Xrange generator in either STL or boost? xrange
Is there an STL/boost algorithm that will test if all the elements between two
In STL/Boost, is there a ready-made output iterator that only counts the number of
I was wondering if there is a native C++ (or STL/Boost) function which will
Is there a C/C++/STL/Boost clean method to convert a date time string to epoch
Are there any bridges to make mixing Qt with STL and Boost as seamless
Is there a way to automatically lock an STL container on access, without having
For the c++ STL, there is a de-facto standard location (besides the de-jour standard
What allocators are available out there for use with STL when dealing with small

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.