Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 629847
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T19:47:31+00:00 2026-05-13T19:47:31+00:00

Is there some Haskell extension that enables the creation of more complex data constructors

  • 0

Is there some Haskell extension that enables the creation of more complex data constructors then GADT?

Suppose I wanted to create a data structure that is an ordered list, and have a data constructor similar to (:) that work with lists, with type signature:

data MyOrdList a where
    (>>>) :: (Ord a) -> a -> MyOrdList a -> MyOrdList a

But I want (>>>) to have a specific behavior, something like this:

(>>>) :: (Ord a) => a -> [a] -> [a]
x >>> [] = [x] 
x >>> xs = low ++ [x] ++ high 
  where low  = filter (<x) xs
      high = filter (>x) xs

So the structure will be always an ordered structure. (I don’t now if this is a good practice, I’m just offering the simplest example that occurred me of the type of behavior I want).

Of course I can use a function (>>>), but then I’ll have no pattern matching and other benefits I’d have it >>> was a data constructor.

Is there any way to do something like this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T19:47:31+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:47 pm

    You could make :>>> a data constructor, but you’d have to hide it to preserve your invariant. Notice that you can pattern-match against it as in render:

    module MyOrdList (mkMyOrdList,MyOrdList,render) where
    
    import Data.List
    
    import qualified Data.ByteString as BS
    
    data MyOrdList a
      = EmptyDataList
      | (:>>>) a (MyOrdList a)
      deriving (Show)
    
    mkMyOrdList [] = EmptyDataList
    mkMyOrdList xs = y :>>> mkMyOrdList ys
      where y = minimum xs
            ys = delete y xs 
    
    render :: (Show a) => MyOrdList a -> String
    render EmptyDataList = "<empty>"
    render (x :>>> xs) = (show x) ++ " -> " ++ render xs
    

    Then you might use the MyOrdList module as in

    module Main where
    
    import Control.Applicative
    import System.IO
    
    import qualified Data.ByteString as BS
    
    import MyOrdList
    
    main = do
      h <- openBinaryFile "/dev/urandom" ReadMode 
      cs <- readBytes 10 h
      -- but you cannot write...
      -- let bad = 3 :>>> 2 :>>> 1 :>>> EmptyOrdList
      putStrLn (render $ mkMyOrdList cs)
      where
        readBytes 0 _ = return []
        readBytes n h = do c <- BS.head <$> BS.hGet h 1 
                           cs <- readBytes (n-1) h
                           return (c:cs)
    

    Sample output:

    54 -> 57 -> 64 -> 98 -> 131 -> 146 -> 147 -> 148 -> 190 -> 250 -> <empty>
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.