Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6202369
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T04:43:19+00:00 2026-05-24T04:43:19+00:00

Is there some way of initializing a Java HashMap like this?: Map<String,String> test =

  • 0

Is there some way of initializing a Java HashMap like this?:

Map<String,String> test = 
    new HashMap<String, String>{"test":"test","test":"test"};

What would be the correct syntax? I have not found anything regarding this. Is this possible? I am looking for the shortest/fastest way to put some “final/static” values in a map that never change and are known in advance when creating the Map.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T04:43:20+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 4:43 am

    All Versions

    In case you happen to need just a single entry: There is Collections.singletonMap("key", "value").

    For Java Version 9 or higher:

    Yes, this is possible now. In Java 9 a couple of factory methods have been added that simplify the creation of maps :

    // this works for up to 10 elements:
    Map<String, String> test1 = Map.of(
        "a", "b",
        "c", "d"
    );
    
    // this works for any number of elements:
    import static java.util.Map.entry;    
    Map<String, String> test2 = Map.ofEntries(
        entry("a", "b"),
        entry("c", "d")
    );
    

    In the example above both test and test2 will be the same, just with different ways of expressing the Map. The Map.of method is defined for up to ten elements in the map, while the Map.ofEntries method will have no such limit.

    Note that in this case the resulting map will be an immutable map. If you want the map to be mutable, you could copy it again, e.g. using mutableMap = new HashMap<>(Map.of("a", "b"));. Also note that in this case keys and values must not be null.

    (See also JEP 269 and the Javadoc)

    For up to Java Version 8:

    No, you will have to add all the elements manually. You can use an initializer in an anonymous subclass to make the syntax a little bit shorter:

    Map<String, String> myMap = new HashMap<String, String>() {{
        put("a", "b");
        put("c", "d");
    }};
    

    However, the anonymous subclass might introduce unwanted behavior in some cases. This includes for example:

    • It generates an additional class which increases memory consumption, disk space consumption and startup-time
    • In case of a non-static method: It holds a reference to the object the creating method was called upon. That means the object of the outer class cannot be garbage collected while the created map object is still referenced, thus blocking additional memory

    Using a function for initialization will also enable you to generate a map in an initializer, but avoids nasty side-effects:

    Map<String, String> myMap = createMap();
    
    private static Map<String, String> createMap() {
        Map<String,String> myMap = new HashMap<String,String>();
        myMap.put("a", "b");
        myMap.put("c", "d");
        return myMap;
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there some way I can use URLs like: http://www.blog.com/team-spirit/ instead of http://www.blog.com/?p=122 in
Is there some way I can define String[int] to avoid using String.CharAt(int) ?
Is there some way to get transliteration to work in Emacs, sort of like
Is there some way to block access from a referrer using a .htaccess file
Is there some way to hide the browser toolbar / statusbar etc in current
Is there some way to cache a generated report in the reporting services, so
Is there some way to get a value from the last inserted row? I
Is there some way to catch exceptions which are otherwise unhandled (including those thrown
Is there some way to have the Mail Merge capability in my application? Maybe
Is there some way to determine what file currently is being rendered by Rails

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.