Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9119127
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T05:19:13+00:00 2026-06-17T05:19:13+00:00

Is this a bug in Eclipse? When declaring a short variable the compiler treats

  • 0

Is this a bug in Eclipse?

When declaring a short variable the compiler treats the the integer literal as a short.

// This works
short five = 5;

Yet it does not do the same when passing integer literals as short parameters, instead a compilation error is generated:

// The method aMethod(short) in the type Test is not applicable for 
// the arguments (int)
aMethod(5); 

It clearly knows when an integer literal is outside the range of a short:

// Type mismatch: cannot convert from int to short
    short notShort = 655254

–

class Test {
    void aMethod(short shortParameter) {
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        // The method aMethod(short) in the type Test is not applicable for 
        // the arguments (int)
        aMethod(5); 

      // the integer literal has to be explicity cast to a short
      aMethod((short)5);

      // Yet here the compiler knows to convert the integer literal to a short
      short five = 5;
      aMethod(five);


      // And knows the range of a short
      // Type mismatch: cannot convert from int to short
        short notShort = 655254
    }
}

Reference: Java Primitive Data Types.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T05:19:15+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 5:19 am

    It’s because when invoking a method, only primitive widening conversions are authorised, not primitive narrowing conversions (which int -> short is). This is defined in the JLS #5.3:

    Method invocation contexts allow the use of one of the following:

    • an identity conversion (§5.1.1)
    • a widening primitive conversion (§5.1.2)
    • a widening reference conversion (§5.1.5)
    • a boxing conversion (§5.1.7) optionally followed by widening reference conversion
    • an unboxing conversion (§5.1.8) optionally followed by a widening primitive conversion.

    On the other hand, in the case of an assignment, narrowing conversion is allowed, provided that the number is a constant and fits within a short, cf JLS #5.2:

    A narrowing primitive conversion may be used if the type of the variable is byte, short, or char, and the value of the constant expression is representable in the type of the variable.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: Eclipse bug? When is a short not a short? In Java I
This is an interesting bug of Eclipse. I am using: Version: Indigo Release Build
I am not sure what started this problem. I submitted it as a bug
Is this a bug or what? Im using Eclipse and I keep getting this
UPDATE 2011.09.13 This bug has been resolved by Adobe. The example code below now
We have this bug that only appears 30% of the time for the Release
I am trying to detetct/work around this bug in RSS elements. That means I
EDIT : As of 2012-06-11 this bug has been finally fixed! https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35981#c1 I have
I have recently discovered that I am affected by this bug http://www.mail-archive.com/mono-bugs@lists.ximian.com/msg71515.html Well, at
I have some data, like this: BUG DATE STATUS ---- ---------------------- -------- 9012 18/03/2008

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.