Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5967999
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T20:01:32+00:00 2026-05-22T20:01:32+00:00

Is this a good practice in Python (from Active State Recipes — Public Decorator

  • 0

Is this a good practice in Python (from Active State Recipes — Public Decorator)?

import sys

def public(f):
  """Use a decorator to avoid retyping function/class names.

  * Based on an idea by Duncan Booth:
  http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/msg/11cbb03e09611b8a
  * Improved via a suggestion by Dave Angel:
  http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/msg/3d400fb22d8a42e1
  """
  all = sys.modules[f.__module__].__dict__.setdefault('__all__', [])
  if f.__name__ not in all:  # Prevent duplicates if run from an IDE.
      all.append(f.__name__)
  return f

public(public)  # Emulate decorating ourself

The general idea would be to define a decorator that takes a function or class
and adds its name to the __all__ of the current module.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T20:01:36+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 8:01 pm

    Yes, it’s a good practice. This decorator allows you to state your intentions right at function or class definition, rather than directly afterwards. That makes your code more readable.

    @public 
    def foo():
        pass 
    
    @public 
    class bar():
        pass
    
    class helper(): # not part of the modules public interface! 
        pass
    

    Note: helper is still accessible to a user of the module by modulename.helper. It’s just not imported with from modulename import *.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is a design question and good practice question. How do you structure your
This is good: import string string.capwords("proper name") Out: 'Proper Name' This is not so
I know there are emulators, but is this good enough? If someone is serious
Following this question: Good crash reporting library in c# Is there any library like
I realised this might be relatively niche, but maybe that's why this is good
This is a good candidate for the Works on My Machine Certification Program .
I'm wondering if this is a good design. I have a number of tables
Does anyone actually think this is a good reason to Dumb down your code?
I'm following this tutorial (seems good) for Rails. After I run ruby script/generate scaffold
PHP, for all its warts, is pretty good on this count. There's no difference

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.