Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6338783
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T19:30:58+00:00 2026-05-24T19:30:58+00:00

Is this a good way to delete a map of longs and objects made

  • 0

Is this a good way to delete a map of longs and objects made with new

// iterate over the map
for (std::map<unsigned long, Object*>::iterator it = objects.begin(), it_end = objects.end(); it != it_end; ++it)
{
    Object* temp = it->second;
    if(temp)
        delete temp;
}

// clear the map
objects.clear();
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T19:30:59+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 7:30 pm

    Yes, although the better solution would be to use smart pointers instead of Object*, but that is a different subject.

    You could shorten the content of the for to

    {
       delete it->second;
    }
    

    delete null is defined and is a noop.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: Is this a good way to generate a string of random characters?
What is a good way to format a python decimal like this way? 1.00
Ok.. So probably an example is a good way to explain this problem So
Is this good practice? Storing objects accessed by a constant. There are plenty of
In this topic I found a good way to prevent cascade deleting of relating
delete_at only takes a single index. What's a good way to achieve this using
is this good code? can it be simplified somehow? SELECT u.id,u.title,u.title,u.first,u.last FROM (((tblusers u
Is this good OO Design assuming you want every inheriting class to be a
I read this good article about Routed Events, and I understood why we need
i want to integrate twitter into my iphone application so i read this good

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.