Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8525863
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T08:06:18+00:00 2026-06-11T08:06:18+00:00

Is this conversion type safe vector<int*> a; const vector<const int*>& b = reinterpret_cast<const vector<const

  • 0

Is this conversion type safe

vector<int*> a;
const vector<const int*>& b = reinterpret_cast<const vector<const int*>&>(a);

A static cast obviously doesnt work in this case because the template argument is changing. But by doing this reinterpret cast, I am just adding constness to essentially the same type. So should this be safe for all practical purposes?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T08:06:19+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 8:06 am

    Like any use of reinterpret_cast to convert a reference to an unrelated type, it gives undefined behaviour, and so is not safe unless you define “safe” to mean “works on my compiler”.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am getting this compiler (gcc 4.5) warning: Formatter.cpp:23: warning: unknown conversion type character
I'm getting this warning from sccanf() : ../../../../ext/oedipus/oedipus.c:211: warning: conversion lacks type at end
Is there a name or a term for this type of conversion in the
In my ASP.Net Web-Application, I'm getting this error: Conversion from type 'DBNull' to type
This isn't exactly the definition of implicit type conversion, but I'm curious how many
I have a question about the implicit type conversion Why does this implicit type
I'm having a problem getting this type conversion working correctly. My guess is the
bool myBool = true; byte myByte; This conversion runs myByte = Convert.ToByte(myBool); This conversion
Why does Convert.ToBoolean(1) throw a System.FormatException ? How should I proceed with this conversion?
So I am trying to address this warning: nonstandard conversion between pointer to function

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.