Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 990219
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T05:54:52+00:00 2026-05-16T05:54:52+00:00

Is this: foreach(Type item in myCollection) { StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(); } much

  • 0

Is this:

foreach(Type item in myCollection)
{
   StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
}

much slower than:

StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();

foreach(Type item in myCollection)
{
   sb = new StringBuilder();
}

In other words, will it really matter where I declare my StringBuilder?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T05:54:52+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 5:54 am

    You could maybe gain some performance, if you write this:

    StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
    foreach(Type item in myCollection)
    {
       sb.Length = 0;
    }
    

    So you have to instantiate the StringBuilder just once and reset the size in the loop, which should be slightly faster than instantiating a new object.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 511k
  • Answers 511k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Its delibrately vague as we don;t want to constrain the… May 16, 2026 at 5:24 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Cribbed from the comments from the link in Tomasz's answer:… May 16, 2026 at 5:24 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If your SQL is designed to work RBAR (Row-by-agonizing-row) then… May 16, 2026 at 5:24 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

Let's start with the following snippet: Foreach(Record item in RecordList){ .. item = UpdateRecord(item,
branch is of checkbox list type, but while looping through this it adds only
Today I coded a function that uses two nested foreach loops. After seeing, that
I have a class that contains a static number of objects. This class needs
Note: I posted a similar question , which was the ancestor of this question,
When I use a foreach loop in C#, it appears that no compile time
I have the following code in one of my methods: foreach (var s in
I am getting an error saying: The model item passed into the dictionary is
I have always thought it was best practice to be explicit in naming my
Through reflection, is there some way for me to look at a generic List's

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.