Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8209683
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T09:48:41+00:00 2026-06-07T09:48:41+00:00

Is this possible easily? It seems the handleResult method is only executed if the

  • 0

Is this possible easily? It seems the handleResult method is only executed if the result isn’t the empty set.

A thought I had was to have handleResult and handleCompletion be member functions of an object and have handleResult update a member variable that handleCompletion can check. If the variable is set, not empty, if variable unset, empty and can act accordingly.

seems to be overly complicated and hoping there’s a better solution?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T09:48:42+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 9:48 am

    to sketch out a solution (the thought i had above) (edit2: per comment I made below)

    function sql() {
        this.results = false;
        var me = this;
    
        this.handleResult = function(aResultSet) {
    
            for (var row = aResultSet.getNextRow(); row;  row = aResultSet.getNextRow()) {
                me.results = true;
    
                var value = row.getResultByName("name");
            }
        };
    
        this.handleError = function(aError) {
            .... //deal with error
        };
    
        this.handleCompletion = function(aReason) {
            if (me.results) {
                ....//results
            } else {
                ....//no results
            }
    
            if (aReason != Components.interfaces.mozIStorageStatementCallback.REASON_FINISHED) {
                ....//handle these
        };
    };
    
    s = new sql(); 
    
    statement.executeAsync({
        handleResult: s.handleResult,
        handleError: s.handleError,
        handleCompletion: s.handleCompletion
    });
    

    is this considered a good way to solve this problem?

    edit1: this doesn’t behave in the manner I’d expect (it works, but not 100% sure why). i.e. the this.results variable is undefined (not false), if handleResult never runs. So it appers as if handleResult and handleCompletion are operating on a different set of variables than I’d expect.

    any help to understand what I’m doing wrong would be appreciated.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We can easily alert anything in java script. Is it possible to get this
Is this possible at all? The idea is to have the following: if ($some_statement)
I'm not sure if this is possible(hoping so). I have a dataset that I
Is this possible to use Ajax.Beginform with update target inside of ajax form. like
Is this possible if I click on an anchor link to simulate as if
Is this possible? My code works on Firefox. I can also get webkit to
Is this possible? function testObj(testArg) { //Do obj stuff here } testObj.prototype.addFn = function()
Is this possible? I know how to do it from your own wall but
Is this possible to do? I want to ping or send some kind of
Is this possible? RequestDispatcher rd = request.getRequestDispatcher(index.html); rd.forward(request, response);

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.