Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6671503
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T03:23:46+00:00 2026-05-26T03:23:46+00:00

is this possible? if not, why isn’t this possible in Java? interface B extends

  • 0

is this possible? if not, why isn’t this possible in Java?

interface B extends A {}
public List<B> getList();
List<A> = getList(); // Type mismatch: cannot convert from List<B> to List<A>

I think the topic I’m looking for is “covariant types” as here and here, but its murky and it doesn’t solve my problem.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T03:23:47+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 3:23 am

    Here is an intuitive example of how this can make things go horribly wrong:

    interface B extends A {}
    List<B> blist=new List<B>();
    List<A> alist=blist;
    alist.add(new A()); //should be ok, right?
    B b = blist.get(0); //fail: even though blist is a List<B>, it now has an A in it
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is probably not possible, but I have this class: public class Metadata<DataType> where
I'm not sure if this is possible or not. Basically, I'm writing a script
I am pretty sure this is possible just not sure what is the term
I don't know if this is possible or not, or if my limited knowledge
Is this possible? I had troubles with SVN clients not being able to access
I need to generate Entities/Object from selected tables - not all. Is this possible
I'm not sure this is possible, but in ruby, you can dynamically call a
I'm not sure this is possible, but is there a syntax to be used
This is weird and probably not possible but I'll ask anyway. I'm making this
I'm not quite sure if this is possible, or falls into the category of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.