Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8939201
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T10:46:35+00:00 2026-06-15T10:46:35+00:00

Is this possible? When a type gets passed in to a method, I want

  • 0

Is this possible?

When a type gets passed in to a method, I want to instantiate the generic class myClass

public class myClass<T>
{

}

public void PassInType(Type myType)
{

myClass<myType> c=new myClass<myType>();
}

Update:

Okay since thats not possible, how do I do this

public myMethod(string myType)
{

myClass<myType> c=new myClass<myType>();

}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T10:46:36+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 10:46 am

    No; that’s fundamentally impossible.

    The whole point of generics is that they create compile-time types.
    You’re trying to create a type which is unknown at compile time.

    You can do it using reflection, though. (typeof(MyClass<>).MakeGenericType(myType))

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Can I use dynamic data type in WF 4.0? And if this is possible
In object type macro it is possible below, #define str this is a string
3I was just wondering if this type of query is even possible. If so,
Possible Duplicate: PHP detecting request type (GET, POST, PUT or DELETE) This should be
It's possible to register a class with a parameter expected to be passed from
I supposed to make this type of charts, is it posssible to make through
Is this possible to use Ajax.Beginform with update target inside of ajax form. like
Is this possible if I click on an anchor link to simulate as if
Is this possible? My code works on Firefox. I can also get webkit to
Is this possible? function testObj(testArg) { //Do obj stuff here } testObj.prototype.addFn = function()

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.