Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6843679
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T00:16:28+00:00 2026-05-27T00:16:28+00:00

Is this possible without going through the list and casting the objects? I also

  • 0

Is this possible without going through the list and casting the objects?

I also need to convert List<Object> to List<T> (T = predefined Object) if it’s possible?

Edit: for clarification, I’m trying to use List<Object> as a return type of a class method that is widely used in my code.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T00:16:28+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 12:16 am

    No. This is simply not a valid conversion, because not all Objects are String[].


    You could have determined this for yourself in 2 lines of code.


    Edit

    It sounds like you need to write the method more generically. Something like this:

    public <T> List<T> getGenericList()
    {
        return new ArrayList<T>();
    }
    

    This can return a List<String[]> like so:

    List<String[]> listOfStringArr = getGenericList();
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Without going into whether this is a good or bad idea: Is it possible
Is it possible to somehow do this without taking out the @? It does
Is it possible to do this natively without addons or 3rd party tools? I
For instance is it possible to write this if (variable != null) without using
Without going into detail about what I'm trying to achieve, is it possible (and
I was going through a possible implementation method for library function strcpy . It
I apologize if this is an obvious question, but I'm going through the Java
Is this possible? I want to have the To:, Body, and an Attachment all
Is this possible? I am looking forward to a tutorial which explains the steps
Is this possible? I had troubles with SVN clients not being able to access

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.