Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6982403
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T18:17:02+00:00 2026-05-27T18:17:02+00:00

Is !!(x) guaranteed by the standard to return 0/1? Note that I am not

  • 0

Is !!(x) guaranteed by the standard to return 0/1?

Note that I am not asking about c++, where a bool type is defined.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T18:17:03+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 6:17 pm

    Yes, in C99, see §6.5.3.3/4:

    The result of the logical negation operator ! is 0 if the value of its operand compares
    unequal to 0, 1 if the value of its operand compares equal to 0. The result has type int.
    The expression !E is equivalent to (0==E).

    So !x and !!y can only yield 0 or 1, as ints.

    For other operators, in C99, see also Is the "true" result of >, <, !, &&, || or == defined?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The standard explicitly states that main has two valid (i.e., guaranteed to work) signatures;
I wonder if it's guaranteed by the C++ standard that single inheritance make the
Does the standard guarantee that order of equal elements will not change (eh, forgot
int is usually 32 bits, but in the standard, int is not guaranteed to
Is the following code guaranteed by the standard to work(assuming st is not empty)?
Is the return value of this function well defined by the C standard ?
In C# is it guaranteed that expressions are evaluated left to right? For example:
Is the return value of GetHashCode() guaranteed to be consistent assuming the same string
If I have two models that are guaranteed to have a one-to-one correspondence, i.e.
Does C++ standard guarantee that here would be no crash when returning auto_ptr 's

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.