Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 824631
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T03:07:36+00:00 2026-05-15T03:07:36+00:00

It appears to me as the easiest, most straightforward solution, but please correct me

  • 0

It appears to me as the easiest, most straightforward solution, but please correct me if I’m wrong.

Instead of having a fulltext index on all individual columns of a table, isn’t it better to just generate one single wide computed column and run the fulltext index against that only?

It appears to me that it gets rid of all the issues of having multiple columns, incl. that I can’t search “x AND y” as this will not match a row with “x” present in column 1 and “y” present in column 2.

Any counterarguments?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T03:07:37+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 3:07 am

    FTS provides ranking and weighting, with you wouldn’t get using a concatenated column…

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

It appears you can put all you need in /bin so why do we
It appears that using perldoc perl gives the list of, e.g. perlre, perlvar, etc.
It appears the Python signal module doesn't have anything similar to the sighold and
It appears that in PHP objects are passed by reference. Even assignment operators do
It appears that Directory.GetFiles() in C# modifies the Last access date of a file.
it appears if you have something like var my_var = {foo : bar}; in
There appears to be some debate about the divide is between wanting an SDK
It appears that each app has access to its own config settings, which could
It appears as though NSNumberFormatter's method for setting custom formatters . setFormat: isn't available
Microsoft appears to be moving a lot of configuration and query capabilities to PowerShell

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.