Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
It has been said that C# can be regarded as a functional programming language, even though it is widely recognized as a OO programming language.
So, what feature set makes C# a functional programming language?
I can only think of:
Anything else?
C# has borrowed a lot of features from ML and Haskell for example:
C# 2.0 brought us parametric polymorphism (or ‘generics’). I’ve heard that Dom Syme, one of the creators of F#, was largely responsible for implementing generics in the .NET BCL.
C# 2.0 also allows programmers to pass and returns functions as values for higher-order functions, and has limited support for anonymous delegates.
C# 3.0 and 3.5 improved support anonymous functions for true closures.
LINQ can be considered C#’s own flavor of list comprehensions.
Anonymous types look like an approximation of ML records
Type-inference is a given.
I don’t know about you, but C# extension methods look an awful lot like Haskell type classes.
There’s been a lot of talk about the ‘dynamic’ keyword in C# 4.0. I’m not 100% sure of its implementation details, but I’m fairly sure its going to use structural typing rather than late binding to retain C#’s compile time safety. Structural typing is roughly equivalent to ‘duck typing for static languages’, its a feature that Haskell and ML hackers have been enjoying for years.
This isn’t to say that C# is a functional programming language. Its still missing important features such as pattern matching, tail-call optimization, and list and tuple literals. Additionally, idiomatic C# is fundamentally imperative with a heavy dependence on mutable state.
I wouldn’t necessarily consider some of those features mentioned above as exclusive to functional programming languages, but its pretty clear that the C# developers have taken a lot of inspiration from functional programming languages in the past few years.